Saturday 29 February 2020

Stokesley 1832-1841: the New Mill on Levenside



1960s aerial view looking towards the New Mill buildings (now Millbry Hill country store).  
Thomas went into partnership in his new venture of building a flax-spinning mill on Levenside with James Blacket. 

James and John Blacket

Some accounts (such as the Wikipedia page for Edmund Thomas Blacket) state that this was James Blacket senior, who was a Wesleyan draper in London, clearly in a good way of trade and widely respected.  He was born in about 1786 in West Smithfield and married Margaret Harriet, daughter of the Rev Edward Ralph; I suspect this was the Rev Ralph who was the minister of the Independent congregation at Maidstone. 

Other accounts (for example, the Australian Dictionary of Biography, Vol 3, 1969) suggest that Thomas's partner was James Blacket senior's son James.  I rather think this is the most likely, for two reasons.  Firstly, that it seems unlikely that James senior would risk his standing and his large family's financial future in a speculative endeavour in the far-off North Riding, where he wouldn't be able to keep an eye on proceedings and with a man he can have known only slightly.  Secondly, that I haven't been able to see any sign that James senior was affected when the Stokesley enterprise failed, as will be seen later.  James senior continued in his prosperous business as a draper.  Notices in the newspapers show that he was for several years in the 1840s one of the auditors of the Hope Life Assurance Company, and notices in the London Gazette show that he took his son Frank William Blacket into partnership in the drapery business in Islington and West Smithfield, before finally retiring at the end of 1856 before his death on 28 November 1858.

On the other hand, I expect James senior helped to fund his son's venture in the hope of setting him up in a good way of business.  One wonders, given his growing family and the number of his enterprises, how much of the money that Thomas Mease put into this new undertaking was borrowed. 

James Blacket junior was born, as recorded in the Nonconformist Registers, at 85 St Margaret's Hill, Southwark on 21 December 1808.  So he was sixteen years younger than Thomas.  At the beginning of 1832, Thomas was 40 and James was 23; James would have been very much the junior partner.

Thomas was now a significant figure in Stokesley, with the Paper War and the polemic against tithes and the Corn Laws to his credit, and the spinning factory and the grocery and drapery business.  The Poll Book of 1834 shows that he owned freehold houses and land, occupied by himself and tenants, while his father John owned and occupied his own freehold house.  Their houses were Number 42 High Street and the house next door, and were described in the auction notices in 1838 (for example, the Leeds Mercury, 26 May 1838) as
Two substantial Freehold dwelling-houses situate in the North Row of the Market Town of Stokesley aforesaid, with a Four-stalled Stable, Granaries, Coach-House, and other Out-offices, and a good Garden well stocked with Fruit Trees, behind the same, late in the several Occupations of Messrs John Mease, the Elder, and Thomas Mease.  The above Premises are well adapted for a wholesale or retail Business.
It seems likely that the "substantial" house next door to Number 42 was the one immediately to the east, described in Buildings of Stokesley as "a double fronted house of some distinction" obscured from view for us by the fact it is now divided into two shops:  "Behind the two shop fronts lies the clue, an attractive doorway which led to an elegant hall and staircase.  The upper floors with their large canted bays on three levels made a handsome town house for a man of means."

I don't know – and I don't know if it is known – how the Blacket family came to meet Thomas Mease.  It may somehow have been through their shared Wesleyan Methodism or because both Thomas and James senior was in the drapery business.  However it came about, both James junior and his brother John were established in Stokesley by the spring of 1832.

That May, John Blacket "of Stokesley" married Elizabeth Stephens in the parish of St Matthew's, Brixton.  John was then 24 years old (he was a year older than his brother James) and a solicitor.  He went into partnership with William Garbutt and William Fawcett of Yarm in the Stokesley office of the practice.  Again, it is probable that his father must have helped him buy into the practice and set himself up.  John and Elizabeth's first son, John Stephens Blacket, was born in Stokesley on 16 April 1833 and Mrs Mary Mease, Thomas's wife, was present at the birth alongside Dr Allardice.  A second son, Edward Ralph, was born in spring 1835 and a third, William Russell, in spring 1837 – Mary Mease was present then, too.

John and James Blacket soon became part of the town, and in particular the life of the Wesleyan chapel.  John Blacket's sons were baptised by the Wesleyan minister, Robert Newton.  The Durham Chronicle of 25 November 1836 report of the "Half-Yearly Meeting of the North Riding Association of the Independent Ministers and Congregations" held at Stokesley in October shows that James Blacket was in the Chair.  

Notices in the York Herald (19 December 1835) and the Northampton Mercury (25 February 1837) tell the story of James' sadly brief married life in these years.  He married Hannah Nunneley of Market Harborough at the end of December 1835; in February 1837, little more than a year later, she died at the age of 24.

Thomas Mease & the Broughton Bridge Bleach Mill

Thomas Mease and Mary Mellanby, meanwhile, now had six children and he was still looking outward to new possibilities for improving his business.  In 1818 he had been eager for a canal to link the River Tees to the Durham coalfields; the Durham Chronicle of 6 May 1836 shows that he was in the list of County Subscribers to the South Durham Railway which was to link the Clarence Railway to the collieries in Weardale.  He had been giving his occupation as "manufacturer" since at least 1827 when his son Joseph Mellanby Mease was baptised.  

He was also in the bleaching business, possibly from his early days in linen manufacture.  Operating your own bleach works saved the cost of sending your unbleached, brown linen elsewhere.  Thomas was a partner in Messrs Benjamin & John Claxton & Company, operating a bleach mill with a steam engine of 16 Horse Power at Broughton Bridge.  (Broughton Bridge is outside Stokesley, on the left of the road going towards Great Broughton, about 200 metres past the turn-off onto Ellerbeck Way, the entrance to the Industrial Estate.  The Bleach Mill was sited on Broughton Bridge Beck, which becomes the Ellerbeck; this flows through the Industrial Estate on its way to the Leven.)  The road from Stokesley to Great Broughton runs from the top left of the O.S. map 1888-1913 shown below, and obviously Old Beach Mill means Old Bleach Mill!
O.S. map 1888-1913, reproduced by permission of the National Library of Scotland from their website
Bleaching linen in the traditional way had been a lengthy process but experimentation with chemical methods had speeded things up enormously.  This saved money and time – and sorted out the perennial problem of people stealing the linen while it was laid out on the bleach grounds.  I believe it also dealt with the increasing problem that the rise of industrialisation and the growing number of factory chimneys meant that it was becoming hard to find somewhere where linen could be laid out to bleach for long periods without being spotted by soot.  There is a description of the bleaching process – which was far from environmentally friendly – in the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica and in The Archaeology of Improvement in Britain, 1750–1850, by Sarah Tarlow

I haven't been able to find a description of the use of the steam engine in bleaching in the 1830s, but I think it may have been used, for example, to power the beetling engine.  Traditionally, linen had been given a smooth and shiny finish by being pounded over the stones of a riverbed with wooden blocks, but a machine had been invented in 1736 to do this much more effectively and quickly (see this explanation).  We know that the Broughton Bridge mill had beetling equipment as it features in the auction sales notices in 1839.

Thomas's partners in this business were Benjamin and John Claxton.  In Baines' Directory 1823, Benjamin Claxton had, like Thomas, been listed among the grocers & tea dealers and linen & woollen drapers.  He left that trade and with John Claxton – possibly a much younger cousin or brother – became a Linen Bleacher at Broughton Bridge and at Easby.  (This can be seen from his description in a notice in the London Gazette of 6 February 1838).  He must be the Benjamin Claxton born c1785 in Yarm who appears later in the Kildale census of 1841 and the Easby census of 1851 as a bleacher. 

The partnership between Thomas and the Claxtons may have begun at the very start of his manufacturing enterprises and must certainly have been in place in 1830 when he and his sister Rachel were witnesses at the marriage of John Claxton and Mary Ann Geldart, both of the parish of Stokesley, on 16 March 1830. 

(John Claxton and his wife Mary Ann can be found later in the 1851 census in London.  John was born in about 1806 in Yarm, and Mary Ann in Sunderland.  The Bishop's Transcript of the Sunderland registers shows that she was born on 2 February 1804, the daughter of William Geldart, butcher, and Hannah Fleck; Pallot's Marriage Index 1780-1837 shows that William and Hannah were married in Marske by the Sea and that Hannah was from Upleatham.)

So Thomas was a very busy man, perhaps a little too busy and rather over-stretched – and his timing was unfortunate because, as the 1830s went on, the linen industry came under increasing strain, particularly from the competition with mechanised cotton production.

Thomas Mease goes bankrupt

By the summer of 1837 the Mease and Blacket partnership was not going at all well.  On 1 August the London Gazette carried a notice that the partnership was dissolved and that James Blacket would carry it on alone. 

The wikipedia page for Edmund Thomas Blacket states that the Blackets ended the partnership "as they were unhappy about certain financial matters, and by March 1838, the issue was in Chancery", citing John Walker Ord's History & Antiquities of Cleveland (1846).  However, this is not stated by Ord, who confines himself to a tactful mention of "manufactories" which were established by
men of sufficient enterprise and ability, and prosecuted with ardour and determination; but whether from the cost of coals, the remoteness of markets, the expense of carriage, or the unpropitious state of trade at the time, it was found necessary to close the speculation, and the buildings and machinery were accordingly put to the hammer [ie sold at auction]
We can make a good guess at why James Blacket parted ways with Thomas Mease when we find that four months later on 1 December 1837 Mease was made bankrupt. 

This must have had a shocking effect on the town.  Apart from the debts around the town that Thomas could not pay, the factory behind the High Street was still fully equipped (as can be seen from the auction notice a few months later) and was probably still in operation; the employees would be out of work.  If the grocery & drapery shop was still a going concern, those working there would be unemployed.  The trustees of the Methodist Chapel found themselves embarrassed for funds because Thomas had donated an organ but hadn't paid the cabinet maker who installed it (cf The Methodist Chapels of Stokesley 1765-1994, T Berry).  

Others went down with Thomas.  By the spring, the York Herald was reporting on 28 April that
The Commissioners under the bankruptcy of William Stephenson of Stokesley, linen manufacturer and grocer, sat today at Ludley's Hotel, Stockton for the proof of debts, and choosing assignees.  It appeared that Mr Stephenson's bankruptcy was occasioned by his accepting accommodation bills for Thomas Mease, late a flax-spinner at Stokesley, to the amount of upwards of £5,000. 
((It is notoriously tricky to establish current equivalents, but the Bank of England historic inflation calculator puts £5,000 at nearly £560,000 in 2019.  There is a useful explanation of bills of exchange here)

Mr Stephenson's fate must have caused a great deal of ill-feeling in the town.

When the affairs of Thomas Mease and William Stephenson went crashing about their ears, they could go bankrupt – they qualified because they bought and sold goods for a living.  It was an expensive process, so they would need friends to rally around, but they avoided imprisonment for debt (see this article in the London Gazette online) 

When Messrs Benjamin & John Claxton & Company went under in Thomas Mease's crash and the Claxtons were unable to pay their debts, they became "insolvent debtors".  They seem to have been in London when the crisis came, as the notice in the London Gazette of 6 February 1838 shows that at first they were both lodging at Number 7 Falcon-street, Falcon-square in the city of London.  I think this may have been a sponging-house where debtors could be temporarily confined.  John Claxton's next address was given as No 347 Rotherhithe-wall in the county of Surrey.  Then, after a notice that the creditors would be meeting at the offices of Garbutt, Blacket & Fawcett in Stokesley on 20 April 1838, John disappears from sight.  He and Mary Ann went on to live in London, where he was in 1851 a coal merchant, but by 1861 they had moved out of the city to New Brentford, where he describes himself in the census as a Commercial Clerk.

Benjamin's position was worse.  The addresses given for Benjamin in the notices in the London Gazette show that, after being with John at Falcon Street, his next address was Number 6 Soley-terrace, Pentonville.  Then the London Gazette of 26 June 1838 shows that he was "lately discharged from the Fleet Prison."  So he suffered the fate of Charles Dickens' father and his great creations Mr Micawber and Mr Dorrit, and found himself in the horrid conditions of debtors' prison – and of the notorious Fleet Prison at that.  He was finally able to return to Cleveland and to work as a bleacher again; the parish registers of Ingleby Greenhow show that he was buried there on 20 October 1864 at the age of 79.

This notice from the Leeds Mercury of 26 May 1838 shows that not only was Thomas Mease's property up for sale, but also his father's – perhaps to pay for the bankruptcy and raise money for Thomas's family:
STOKESLEY, - By Messrs Appleton and Farrow, on Tuesday, the Nineteenth Day of June, 1838, at the House of Mr William Naylor, the Sign of the Golden Lion, in Stokesley, in the County of York, at Three o'Clock in the Afternoon, either in the following or in such other Lots as may be agreed upon at the Time of Sale, and subject to the Conditions to be then produced: 
Two substantial Freehold dwelling-houses situate in the North Row of the Market Town of Stokesley aforesaid, with a Four-stalled Stable, Granaries, Coach-House, and other Out-offices, and a good Garden well stocked with Fruit Trees, behind the same, late in the several Occupations of Messrs John Mease, the Elder, and Thomas Mease.  The above Premises are well adapted for a wholesale or retail Business. 
Also all that extensive Flax and Tow Spinning Mill, conveniently situated behind the said Dwelling-Houses, late in the Occupation of the said Thomas Mease, comprising a capital STEAM-ENGINE, 28 Horse Power, with Two Boilers complete; Nine Spinning Frames, containing 406 Spindles; Two Double and Two Single Carding Engines; several Drawing and Roving Frames, Shafts, Wheels, Drums, and other Requisites.  Also a Counting-House and several Warehouses contiguous to the same.  The Mill is sufficiently large for containing Four Times the Quantity of Machinery. 
Lot 2.  All that capital FREEHOLD BLEACH MILL, with the Water Power and a STEAM-ENGINE, 16 Horse Power, and all other Requisites for carrying on the Bleaching Business on an extensive Scale, and Two Closes of excellent Grass Land, situate at Broughton Bridge, near Stokesley aforesaid, containing together, by Estimation, 13 acres and 2 roods, or thereabouts, be the same more or less, late in the Occupation of Messieurs Benjamin and John Claxton and Company. 
Immediate Possession may be had of all the Premises (except the House lately occupied by Thomas Mease), and if the same be not sold they will be let.
Tenants were found for the houses on North Row (the High Street) but, perhaps unsurprisingly given the economic conditions, buyers could not be found.  In September there was another attempt to sell the machinery.  On 14 September 1838, the Durham County Advertiser carried a notice that Flax Spinning Machinery was to be sold by auction on 3 October 1838 "in the Thread Warehouse, adjoining the New Mill, at Stokesley" and that "Part of the above Machinery has never been in use, and the rest of it is nearly as good as new.  All the Frames are constructed for Hot Water Spinning, on the newest principle."

But it seems that there were still no buyers.  On 5 October 1838 the Newcastle Courant advertised the Spinning Mill "with the Steam Engine, Twenty eight Horse Power and Machinery, ... If the Premises be not sold or let for a Spinning Mill, they will be let as a Flour Mill, for which Purpose they were heretofore used" and the Bleach Mill and Grounds were all "to be sold or let with immediate possession."

Still there were no takers.  There was another try in May 1839.  The Durham County Advertiser of 10 May 1839 carried the notice of an auction to be held at the Golden Lion (nowadays called Chapters) that would include, as well as the freeholds of the houses (Mr Strother the surgeon occupying one and Mr Taylor the druggist the other), the remaining property in separate lots:
Lot 3 All that Extensive Building, lately used by Thomas Mease, a Bankrupt, as a Flax and Tow Spinning Mill, with the Out-Offices attached thereto, situate behind the said Dwelling-Houses
Lot 4 All that Four-stalled Stable, with the Saddle Room, Granaries, & Coach-house, adjoining the last Lot
Lot 5 A freehold dwelling house and building, lately used as a Bleach Mill, immediately adjoining a good Stream of Water, with the Mill Dam and Race and 2a 2r 21p of Land, siuate at Broughton Bridge, near Stokesley aforesaid, late in the occupation of Messrs Benjamin and John Claxton and Company
Lot 6 A close of grass land, adjoining Lot 5 and containing 5 acres
Lot 7 A close of grass land, adjoining Lot 6, and containing 8a 2r 11p.
A possible sweetener was offered:
Two thirds of the Purchase Money of each of the above Lots may remain on Mortgage, if required.
Meanwhile, in the Spinning Mill another auction was to be held "without Reserve" offering the steam engine from the flax-spinning mill behind the High Street (28 horse power).  At the Bleach Mill, all the equipment was to be sold:
A Steam Engine, 16 Horse Power, a Water-wheel, two Wash-Mills and Shafts, Metal Pump, three Lead Pumps, Boiler, Bars and Starching Kettle, two Souring and one Booking Tub, Crane, Shafting and Wheels, two Beetling Engines, one Dutch Calendar, Press, five Tables, Leaden Retort, two Cisterns & Pan, rolled Iron Pan, two broken Metal Pans, and all other the Bleaching Utensils.
In the meantime Thomas and his family had been continuing to live in Stokesley, occupying (as can be seen from an advertisement in the Durham Chronicle of 9 November 1839) a 
Freehold Mansion-House, substantially built of Brick and beautifully faced with Free Stone, suitable for the residence of a genteel family, eligibly situated at the west end of Stokesley aforesaid and late in the occupation of Mr Thomas Mease, Flax Spinner.  
Next door to it was the 
Freehold Shell of a Mansion-House, adjoining to and built in the same style ... This Shell may, at a trifling expense, be completed and rendered fit for the reception of a large family.
Adjoining the Shell were three lots of Garden Ground suitable for building plots.  I don't know where these houses stood.

It seems likely that it was soon after this that Thomas went with his family to live in France, either because it was cheaper or because he couldn't immediately find the funds to pay his way in Stokesley.  He may in fact have made the move more than once.  His son Joseph Mellanby Mease (1827-1928) at the end of his life spoke to a journalist (Leeds Mercury, 14 September 1927) about travelling by stagecoach to his school in Doncaster, and said that it was while he was at school that his parents went to live in Paris.  He went to join them there when he was about fourteen, travelling by paddle steamer from the Thames to cross the Channel to Boulogne, and thence by "an old fashioned diligence" to Paris, "which took him 24 hours".  The journalist reported that his father was then English representative for "Blood's Bank" but I can find no bank of that name.

The Blacket brothers leave Stokesley

All this time the Blacket brothers had remained in Stokesley.  Now John Blacket decided to make a career change.  The London Gazette of 6 August 1839 carried the notice of the dissolution of partnership between him, William Garbutt and William Fawcett.  He appeared in White's Directory of 1840 not as an attorney but as Receiver General of Crown Rents for the Northern District.  In effect, he was now a member of the civil service; the profits from the monarch's Crown Estate were surrendered to Parliament in return for a fixed civil list payment in 1760.  That year, John moved his family to 20 South Street, Durham (according to the autobiographical note in Durham University Archives for 94 letters written from India where his eldest son John Stephens Blacket was with the East Indian Railway as a surveyor during the period of the Indian Mutiny here)

At the time of the 1841 census, John and his wife were with his parents at Grecian Lodge, Brixton Hill, Lambeth but within months they had left for Ireland.  He was described as the "new agent of the Bessborough estate" in newspaper reports in the last week of November 1841 when he was sworn in as a magistrate of the County Kilkenny.  He and his family lived at Balline House (also spelt Ballyne, Bolline, and now Belline), Piltown.  This was the house always occupied by the Earl of Bessborough's agent and a photograph of it can be seen here.  He died there on 4 February 1881. 

The three boys who were born in Stokesley were John Stephens Blackett (1833-1922) who became a Civil Engineer and Land Agent; Edward Ralph Blackett (1835-93), who was a doctor who was a surgeon in India before practising in Suffolk, where he is remembered today for having been (wrongly) suspected of writing an anonymous satirical novel about his neighbourhood and as an amateur artist; and William Russell Blackett (1837-93), an Anglican clergyman who "held for some years an important educational position in India under the Church Missionary Society, and has served as a member of the Indian Government Commission on Education" [The Graphic, 12 September 1891] and was principal of the Home and Colonial Training College.  All of them spent time in India.

James Blacket must have been hoping to ride out the economic difficulties but he was struggling to make a go of the New Mill.  In Lambeth in early 1839 he married again.  His new wife was Sarah Ralph, presumably a relation through his mother, and he brought her back north to Stokesley.  In White's Directory 1840 he is listed as a Flax spinner and Patent Thread Manufacturer.  Unfortunately within a very short while his business failed and he was made bankrupt on 15 December 1840.

James also had a warehouse in Leeds – we do not know whether this was part of his attempt to make a success of the business, or whether he had been operating this warehouse when he went into partnership with Thomas Mease – and on 20 March 1841 the Leeds Mercury carried a notice that the yarns, tow, threads, linens etc that was his stock in trade in Leeds were to be sold by auction.  At the same time, "the machinery and effects of Mr James Blacket, a Bankrupt" were to be sold at the New Mill in Stokesley – the machinery was described as valuable and "nearly new and upon the most improved Principles".  Even the Mill Clock was listed in the advertisement.  It is interesting to note that the New Mill buildings were not put up for auction and I don't know who owned them either before or after Blacket's bankruptcy.  Later on in the day, after James Blacket's machinery was sold, "the Proprietor" of the New Mill was offering spinning frames and other machinery for sale; it seems that whoever had bought the mill buildings was not going to attempt to carry on the flax spinning business.  It was afterwards a steam-powered flour mill for many years.

So steam-powered flax-spinning in Stokesley came to an end and the effect on the town must have been very great – according to the Parliamentary Gazetteer of England & Wales 1845-6, the flax-mill had employed 139 hands in 1838. 

By the spring of 1842, James and Sarah had moved to Newbury, Berkshire, where their eldest son Walter James Blacket was born.  Five years later Sarah died, leaving James once more a widower, and this time with three little boys.  He was now a bookseller & printer and by 1851 he employed four hands.  In that year he married for a third time, to Mary Pashley.  The wedding, according to the Nottinghamshire Guardian of 26 June 1851, took place at the Independent Chapel, Worksop and Mary was the daughter of the late Mr Pashley of Worksop, wine and spirit merchant.

James's son Walter followed him into the business and by 1871 was evidently very successful, employing six men and five boys.  James died on 19 May 1877.

In the last few years of his time in Stokesley, James had been joined at the mill by his younger brother Edmund Thomas Blacket (1817-83).  Unsurprisingly – it was only a small market town – Edmund met Thomas Mease's daughter Sarah and the young couple fell in love, much to the annoyance of both families.  The Blackets may well have blamed Thomas for profligacy or carelessness with money or deceiving them as to the prospects of the venture, while the expense of James's bankruptcy and the loss of the family's investments in his business – which perhaps lay behind John Blacket becoming a land agent – must have made relations between the two families increasingly bitter.  Finally Edmund and Sarah married in Wakefield on 27 April 1842.  Their parents boycotted the ceremony.  Some weeks later they left for Australia where Edmund became a well-known architect. 

It is said that before leaving home, Sarah engraved her name with a diamond ring on the window of a Mease family house in Stokesley, and apparently also in a family house in Hutton Rudby and that the window was last seen during the Second World War by a member of the Australian family, who was staying with Jennie Mease in Hutton Rudby while on leave.  Unfortunately we don't know where these windows might have been found.

A final note on the Blackets – the family in England took to spelling their name with a final double 't' and this is sometimes to be found applied to the earlier Blacket generations.

Thomas Mease & his family after 1847

In the summer of 1847 Thomas and the family were living in Hutton Rudby.  This can be seen from a report in the Leeds Intelligencer of 21 July which shows that Thomas was one of the jury at the trial of Patrick Reid for the Mirfield Murders at the Crown Court, York Castle.  Once more Thomas was taking part in high drama.  Reid was accused of the murder of Mr and Mrs Wraith and their servant Caroline Ellis and the case created a huge sensation.  People flocked to York in the hope of seeing the trial and the newspaper reported that "hundreds of persons were excluded for want of room."  It is probably better remembered today because of the drawing made by Branwell Brontë of "Patrick Reid turned off, without his cap."  It is shown on this website, with an account of the case and the explanation that Branwell's drawing was in fact a self portrait.

On 5 May 1849, old John Mease died in Stokesley at the age of 82.  He had been a widower for many years, as his wife Isabella had died on 1 January 1825.  Thomas was evidently back in Stokesley that summer, and possibly even back in one of the houses that he and his father had once owned.  An auction notice in the Yorkshire Gazette of 8 September 1849 includes a dwelling house "now occupied by Mr Thomas Mease" on the North Row.  Next door, to its west, was a house with a "Capacious Building attached, now used as a Warehouse, Gighouse and Stable" and the two houses shared a yard.  The house occupied by Thomas and his family was very comfortable, having "Dining and Drawing Rooms, Library, Two Kitchens, Cellar, and other requisite Offices, with Four Bed Rooms, and an Attic."

Two years later, by the time of the census of 1851, Thomas was 59 years old and now described himself as an "agent for the sale of Linen Yarn".  He, Mary and their daughter Isabella now lived in the West End of Stokesley some five households away from John Hepburn Handyside, the doctor.  The announcement in the Yorkshire Gazette of 27 January 1855 of the death of his daughter Jane at the age of 21 shows that they had moved again, as he was named as "Thomas Mease, Esq, of Hutton Rudby". 

The 1861 census records him, now a "Mineral Agent", at Bank Bottom, Hutton Rudby.  This must be Leven House, or its precursor.  His wife Mary was with him and two of their children:  Thomas Turnbull Mease and Isabella Mease.  Both were unmarried and Thomas was described as "son of agent variously employed."

Thomas Mease died in Hutton Rudby on 16 July 1862 at the age of 70.  Mary stayed in the village, and died there two years later on 25 February 1864.

Perhaps the loss of his parents was a tipping point for their eldest son, Thomas Turnbull Mease.  His younger brother Joseph Mellanby Mease became a very well-known and respected local figure, but Thomas junior lost his way, as can be seen in a report that appeared in the York Herald of 17 December 1864.  Thomas, "corn miller, Hutton Rudby" was in gaol for debt, at the suit of Messrs Garbutt, corn factors, Hartlepool, for a debt and costs amounting to £32 10s 5d.  Altogether he owed about £80 and had £14 assets in book debts.  He attributed his losses to small profits, falling off in trade, and heavy expenses in working the mill. 

He never recovered from this.  The 1871 Census finds him lodging at 7 Nelson Street, West Hartlepool, and working as a labourer in a sawmill.  The census of 1881 finds him lodging at 12 Grace Street.  Now aged 60, he worked as a Day Watchman.  He died aged 75 in early 1896.

Isabella married Francis Morritt, a Whitby-born hay merchant of Halton near Leeds, at Hutton Rudby on 5 November 1868.  She was 45, though they tactfully entered her age in the parish register as 30, and he was half a dozen years older than she.  He was a widower and his youngest child was five.  She died less than three years later on 14 October 1871.

Joseph Mellanby Mease lost his arm in 1860 and lived until 1928, a much celebrated centenarian.  The story of how he lost his arm and his reminiscences in later life can be found here and here.

Joseph Mellanby Mease

Many thanks to Judy Kitching and Malcolm McPhie for the aerial view of Stokesley.  There are more to be seen on the Facebook page of the Hutton Rudby & District Local History Society.

Stokesley 1823-1834: the flax-spinning mill behind the High Street

This follows the post The linen mills of Stokesley & Hutton Rudby: 1823-1908

1823 was the year in which the spinning factory of Messrs T & J Mease was erected just off Stokesley High Street.

The Mease family had been a presence on the High Street since the early 1790s.  The head of the family was John Mease, a respectable Wesleyan Methodist shopkeeper; at the beginning of 1823 he was 56 years old.  He and his wife Isabella Turnbull had two sons and three daughters: Thomas, Isabella, John, Rachel and Mary.  

John Mease was in business as a grocer and draper, but he was also a butter and cheese factor and sold Cleveland's dairy products to the London market.  Twenty years earlier, in 1802, Bell's Weekly Messenger on 14 November had carried a report from the police office at Union Hall in Southwark which gives us a glimpse of John.  

He was in London on business and that morning was "returning from Westminster through Lambeth-road" when he was approached by a respectable-looking man who, asking him if he was from Yorkshire, fell into conversation with him.  The stranger invited Mease to meet someone he knew who was in the same line of business as himself at Woolwich, and doing very well as he had a contract to supply the Navy.  They went to a pub where they met the man, one William Hill, who asked Mease the name of the salesman he used in London and promised him an order.  This, however, was merely window-dressing – the men were confidence tricksters and were hoping to cheat Mease out of the money they guessed he was carrying.  When Mease proved too suspicious for them, Hill snatched the money and ran, but was caught by Mease and some passers-by and brought before the magistrates. 

We can see that John Mease was no country bumpkin, ignorant of the ways of the world.  And Stokesley at the time of the Revolutionary & Napoleonic Wars (1793-1815) was a lively, outward-looking town.  The poet William Mason described its "busy and active life"
in a day when your public houses included, in addition to the present thirteen inns, the George and Dragon, the Half Moon, The Masons Arms, the Chequers, the Raffled Anchor, the Ship Inn, &c; 
when the war of American Independence had only subsided, followed by the French Revolution, and the wars of the Bonapartes were at their prime; 
when your captains in the East India Company’s service, your sailors in the mercantile marine, your harpooners who had gone down to the sea in ships and struck the Leviathan in the iced waters, came back to lay up for the winter, as well as the Jack Tar on leave from the Royal Navy, who had gone either by impressment or accepted bounty; 
when your markets were great gatherings of the rurals; your butchers’ shambles were filled with meat; when coals stood for sale in front of the square at the Swan, and the turf-graver brought his wares in donkey carts from Osmotherley; 
when the farmer and his dame rode on the pillion seat to the steppings at the inn; when handloom weaving was good, and intelligence amongst that class of operatives was great; 
when all these met at the hostelries to hear tales of adventure from the sailors, and the sparkles of wit from the literati of the town 
This was the world in which John's son Thomas, who was baptised in Stokesley in February 1792, grew up.  Thomas was remembered by his family (according to tradition in Hutton Rudby) as a gifted artist, inventive with his hands, a carver of objects in jet, a speculator and inventor who often had to take his family abroad to avoid his creditors.  His life history shows that he must have been a man of charm and charisma, who loved the public stage, was eager to take on arguments and controversies, and who made ambitious plans and entered into them boldly.

In or by 1800 (according to the Stokesley Flax Mill timeline on the Stokesley Heritage website, quoting Title Deeds research by Tom Berry), John Mease and an unnamed cabinet maker leased the house we know now as Number 42 High Street, Stokesley, "with shop and yard, garden and orchard behind".
Number 42 is the tallest building on the left
It stands on the north side of the High Street – known in the 19th century as North Row – not far from the Wesleyan Methodist Church (until 1883 this was the site of the Black Swan Inn) and was until recently occupied by Barclays Bank.  It is described in the Stokesley Society's Buildings of Stokesley as 
the jewel in the crown of the High Street.  Built of small bricks with handsome sandstone quoins and kneelers and a moulded cornice at the eaves ... retaining its bow windows, flat well proportioned sash windows and, best of all, its doorway under a wonderful shell canopy, the whole being completed with dormer windows in its Welsh slate roof.
In 1816 Thomas, aged 24, married Mary Mellanby in Whitby, where St Mary's parish registers describe him as a grocer.  A couple of years later, the Durham County Advertiser of 11 July 1818 records what must have been one of his earliest entries into public life when he and his father were among the many signatories to an address to the Mayor of Stockton requesting a meeting of the town and neighbourhood to consider forming a Canal to take cargoes such as coal and lime from Evenwood Bridge in County Durham to the Tees, for the benefit of trade.  (In the event, the Stockton & Darlington Railway was built).  Then in 1822 Thomas burst into print in the Stokesley "Paper War".

In the spring of that year Thomas's wife Mary and another lady had called twice upon the bookseller and radical Robert Armstrong for donations to the Wesleyan Methodist Missionary Society.  He took the view that they had been sent out to beg by their husbands and he was not in sympathy with their cause, telling them
I did not believe Humanity and Charity to be at all the object in view of their employers, and that in my humble opinion they had much better stay at home and cultivate the Heathen among their own sect.
On Monday 2 June 1822, Thomas Mease gave a forceful speech to a Wesleyan Methodist Missionary meeting in which he attacked Armstrong and his beliefs.  He was so pleased with the reception of the speech that he arranged for it to be printed.  Armstrong responded, hostilities began and the Paper War was soon in full swing.  It lasted until the summer of 1824.  The full story, including the unedifying quarrels over the deathbed of old John Appleton in the workhouse, is told here

Tom Berry's research shows that by 1822 Number 42 High Street belonged to John Mease and Thomas Mease with two tenants, and that within a few years it was occupied by John and both his sons, Thomas and John junior.  They converted the garden, which lay behind the house, and the warehouse wine vaults into a "corn mill and spinning factory".

John senior had not been content with his shop but had branched out into selling butter and cheese to London.  Thomas had gone into the same line of business as his father and is listed in Baines' Directory of 1823 as a grocer & tea dealer and linen & woollen draper, but he expanded into the production of cloth.  

Stokesley, like Hutton Rudby, was a centre of linen weaving and one of Thomas's earliest ventures was into linen manufacture – which is to say, employing handloom weavers to produce cloth which he sent to a bleachyard and then sold on.  We catch a glimpse of this business, which was evidently running concurrently with the spinning factory, in a notice in the London Gazette of 22 May 1829.  This records the end of a linen manufacturing partnership between Thomas and John Mease and John Barr of Stokesley.  This had also been a side venture for John Barr, who was listed, like Thomas, as a grocer & draper in the 1823 Baines' Directory.  Evidently while he and Thomas had managed the Stokesley end of the business, John Mease was in charge of marketing their cloth in Manchester because he is named in the notice in the Gazette as "John Mease of Manchester".  

The "spinning factory" was a more ambitious venture.  Baines' Directory 1823 shows that Thomas and his brother had set up the business of "T & J Mease," flax & tow spinners.  (The subordinate position of the "J" in the firm name must mean that this was his brother John, who was seven years younger than Thomas and now about 24 years old, not his father John.)  

They were embarking on the mechanised spinning of flax and tow into yarn.  It had proved much easier to mechanise the production of cotton than linen, but linen manufacturing began to make up lost ground when in 1787 the first machine to spin flax was developed in Darlington by John Kendrew.  Flax and tow are produced when the flax plant is broken down, resulting in long line fibres that make a fine, strong yarn and short tow fibres that make heavier, coarser yarn.  (A succinct description of the processes can be found here).  
Flax spinning mill
Baines' Directory recorded that
A considerable manufacture of linen is carried on here, and that trade is likely to be extended, by a mill, which Messrs Thomas and John Meale [a typo for Mease] are now erecting, to be worked by the power of steam.  
The Mease brothers' plan was to power their frames of spindles with a steam engine and the machines in which they invested will have been later models than Kendrew's, developed in Barnsley and Leeds. 

Many of Thomas and John's employees are likely to have been very young.  R P Hastings' Hutton Rudby: An Industrial Village (1979) notes that in 1841 the Hutton Rudby mill was worked by two flaxdressers and ten spinners who were mostly girls and boys in their 'teens.  An advertisement placed by an Otley mill at this time shows the workforce they were seeking:
Leeds Mercury, 26 April 1823
Wanted, at a Flax Spinning Mill, Three or Four large Families of Children.  If the Fathers of such Families are either Hecklers, Weavers, or Husbandmen, the Whole can have constant Employment at good Wages.
Further Particulars can be had on Application to Mr Meek, of Knaresbro'; or Mr Howgate, at West-End Mill, near Otley
This excerpt from Historic England's website gives an idea of what happened when a child was not quick to learn the knack of the work
Samuel Downe, who was born in Shrewsbury in 1804, worked in Ditherington Flax Mill from the age of 10. He described working conditions in the factory during a Parliamentary Enquiry in 1832:
 "we used to generally begin at five o’clock in the morning till eight at night".  When asked had he received punishment he replied "yes, I was strapped most severely till I could not bear to sit upon a chair without pillows, and I was forced to lie upon my face at night. I was put upon a man’s back and then strapped by the overlooker".  When asked why he was punished he replied… "I had never been in a mill where there was machinery, and it was winter time, and we worked by gas-light, and I could not catch the revolutions of the machinery to take the tow out of the hackles; it requires some practice and I was timid at it."
Improvements followed, and in 1834 the 92 children working at Ditherington Flax Mill only worked part-time and had some schooling between 9-11 am and 3-5 pm.
So the noise of spinning frames and a steam engine and the smoke of a mill chimney were added to the general clamour of Stokesley.  Though the economy took a bad hit after the Napoleonic Wars ended, Stokesley was still a lively place with a broad sense of humour – as can be seen from this account, told as a ridiculous story and evidently picked up by newspapers across the country.  This is from the Sussex Advertiser 
Sussex Advertiser, 23 May 1825
Marriage Extraordinary
The 24th ult. a marriage was celebrated at Stokesley, in Yorkshire, of a pair who had passed the delightful, anxious period of courtship in the factory of Messrs T and J Mease.  
A fellow workman of the bridegroom's having accepted the important office of giving away the blooming bride, and all the necessary preparations having been attended to, the morning was ushered in by the ringing of the church and factory bells.  The town-crier officially announced the wedding to take place at half-past nine o'clock, and gave a general invitation to the inhabitants to attend.  
The important moment came, and Richard Chambers, sweet sixteen, led forth his blooming bride of fifty-five, "all blushing as Aurora from the East," to the hymeneal altar of the good old town of Stokesley.  All other business was now at a stand.  The town band preceded the nuptial procession to the sacred fane, playing, "Come haste to the Wedding," and other appropriate airs.  After the indissoluble knot had been tied, the "happy, happy, happy pair" were borne in triumph, in chairs, round the town, preceded by the musicians, and followed by a concourse of spectators and guests.  
The ludicrousness of the scene was greatly heightened, by the bridegroom, who is of a very diminutive stature, being publicly shaved by the celebrated tonsor of the place, with a gigantic razor, 30 inches long!  Rustic festivities followed, and mirth and humour drew the curtains of evening over the hilarities of the day.
Raucous days in Georgian times.  I wonder who wrote it (perhaps Thomas Mease?) and whether all the details are correct or whether the newspaper embellished the account.  It's interesting to note mention of the factory bell, the town-crier and the town band.  It's certainly true that the parish registers record the marriage of a Richard Chambers to Elizabeth Rodery on 25 April 1825. 

Things began to change at the end of the 1820s.  John Barr had retired from the linen manufacturing partnership in May 1829 leaving Thomas and John to continue the business together.  Then on 3 March 1831, a notice in the London Gazette shows that the brothers' flax-spinning partnership had come to an end and that Thomas took over the business.  

By 1834, according to Tom Berry's research into Deeds, 42 High Street was occupied by John Mease, grocer, and sons Thomas, flax spinner and John, linen manufacturer, along with "land and items behind Numbers 36 and 38".  Buildings of Stokesley records that a passage between Numbers 38 and 42 leads to outbuildings that have survived since the Meases' time "with their arches and loading doors with elegant stone surrounds".

The Stokesley Directory database records that Pigot's Directory 1834 lists John Mease jnr as a Linen & Damask Manufacturer on Beck Side, while Thomas was listed as a Flax Dresser, Spinner and Patent Thread Manufacturer on Front Street.

However, there is always a slight lag between the compilation of a Directory and its publication and by the time Pigot's came out, Thomas's plans for a greatly expanded business were well underway.

He bought land on the other side of the River Leven, not far from the packhorse bridge, and was building another flax-spinning mill there.  The building survives as the premises of Millbry Hill (formerly called Armstrong Richardson).  

I have not been able to find confirmation that he built a gas works next to the Mill, as is stated in the letter written to Michael Heavisides (author of Rambles in Cleveland, 1909) by Thomas's son Joseph.  However, that's not to say that he didn't – it would have been an obvious way to increase profits by ensuring long working hours and he would, as stated by Joseph Mellanby Mease, have been able to sell gas to the town under the Lighting and Watching Act 1833.

While Thomas was occupied with business, and with chapel attendance – he was a Wesleyan class leader – he was also engaged in politics.  When the Hon. William Duncombe visited Stokesley during his successful campaign to be elected Tory MP for the North Riding in the winter of 1832/3, the Tories claimed that Thomas had stirred up something approaching a riot when Duncombe tried to address the voters.  Thomas instantly denied the charge and subsequently produced a pamphlet entitled "Two Letters on Tithes and Corn Laws, addressed to the Hon W Duncombe, M.P."  In this Thomas addressed two urgent political questions of the day: reform of the system of tithes and the abolition of the Corn Laws and it was reviewed in the York Herald of 13 July 1833 in the most favourable terms, largely because the reviewer wholeheartedly agreed with Thomas's point of view: 
an excellent little work that has just issued from the press, and which we have perused with no common pleasure ... The author is evidently a man of considerable talent; he has condensed into a pamphlet of 80 pages, a collection of important facts and irrefutable arguments, which might easily have been expanded into a bulky volume.  His language is remarkably terse and perspicuous and the work throughout displays considerable elegance of composition.
The reviewer quotes a passage from the pamphlet to illustrate his point.  In this we can hear Thomas's voice – though we might not agree that this, the first sentence quoted, is so "remarkably terse":
If, then, the Church have no rightful property in tithes, and their compulsory enforcement, under existing regulations be an anti-christian exaction, injurious to both payers and receivers, by exciting bitterness and contentions – and oftentimes expensive law suits too – the only question for determination is, – whether at this crisis of agricultural and national distress, the Clergy of the establishment ought not to be placed upon the apostolical footing of voluntary maintenance; like the accredited Pastors of the general body of Dissenters, who, in learning, and talent and respectability, and usefulness – although certainly not in wealth, and titles, and worldly enjoyment – are by no means their inferiors; that tithes, for the public good, may be duly appropriated to the exigencies of the State.

The linen mills of Stokesley & Hutton Rudby: 1823-1908

The next posts will tell the story of five mills: the two flax-spinning mills of Stokesley, and the flax-spinning mill and two sailcloth mills in Hutton Rudby.

It's also the story of three families – Mease, Blacket and Wilson – and an unusual self-made man, William Surtees.

I have been able to find a great deal of new information, some of which overturns previous assumptions and all of which, I hope, adds greatly to our picture of the people and events concerned.  This is above all thanks to being able to search the online London Gazette and increasing numbers of digitised newspapers.

I have tried to incorporate sources and references as much as possible into the text, hoping to tell the story in a readable fashion. 

One source I have not used is Michael Heavisides' Rambles in Cleveland (1909).  His information derives from a letter he received from Joseph Mellanby Mease.  Joseph was only ten when his father Thomas was made bankrupt and his information seems to me to derive from family anecdotes alone.  Some of it is demonstrably inaccurate and the rest I cannot corroborate, so I have decided to ignore the whole. 


Saturday 15 February 2020

Jacksons of Broughton Grange

Here I have done my best to convert Jim Watson's family trees into content that can make sense and be searchable on the internet.

The family tree begins with Robert Jackson of Wilton Manor, father of William

1st generation   
William Jackson & Dorothy.   William Jackson was a son of Robert Jackson of Wilton.

2nd generation 
William Jackson & Ann
Robert Jackson & Hannah Blacky

3rd generation 
Dorothy Jackson's children
Henry Harper & Mary Sylvester

The 17th & 18th century Jacksons of Broughton Grange

With many thanks to Jim Watson for this information.  We hope that publishing it here will be helpful to people trying to disentangle their Jackson ancestors as well of course to those interested in Great Broughton.

The Jackson family of Broughton Grange, 
descendants of Robert Jackson of Wilton
by Jim Watson  

Today, Broughton Grange is a large arable farm set at the south end of the village of Great Broughton, near Stokesley in North Yorkshire.

Broughton Grange was a farm under Rievaulx Abbey, near Helmsley, from 1316 until the Abbey’s dissolution in 1538.  The subsequent lease changed hands several times before being granted to Hester and John Hewerdyne by Queen Elizabeth.  The Hewerdyne family was resident at Broughton Grange at least until 1629. 

Some time between 1629 and 1636, the Jackson presence at Broughton Grange commenced with William Jackson son of Robert Jackson of Wilton.  In 1637, William Jackson was sued for non payment of tithes for some fields for the year 1636.

In 1650, William Jackson of Broughton Grange conveyed to his brother Robert of Lazenby a messuage and 2 oxgangs of land at Lazenby, and in the same Indenture the conveyance by William’s father Robert to William of Topliffe Farm Great Broughton was recorded.

William died in 1658, leaving his widow Dorothy with five under-age children.  The eldest Jane married William Harrison of Kirkleatham.

It has been recorded in several submissions to the Court of Chancery, that following her husband’s death, Dorothy set about acquiring property to ensure that her three sons would have satisfactory incomes.  It was also recorded that Dorothy spent large sums of money on the Mansion House at Broughton Grange, in excess of £300.  This makes it clear that the Jacksons of Broughton Grange were a wealthy family.

Son William achieved his majority in 1665, and it may be no coincidence that there is a lintel in the Mansion House bearing the initials WJ and the number 1665.  William junior married and had two daughters Anne and Dorothy.  William’s brother Richard died in October 1673, followed by William in November 1673.  Subsequently William’s widow Ann married a widower Edward Edwards, probably about 1681.  The record of the marriage has not been found, and it doesn’t appear to have occurred in the local church St Augustine’s in Kirkby.

Widow Dorothy’s second daughter Margery remained single until her death in 1678.  Dorothy died in 1685, leaving her youngest son Robert as her only surviving male descendant.  About 1690, the Edwards family moved to London, where William and Ann’s two daughters Anne and Dorothy found themselves a husband each, respectively Charles Tracy a lawyer and John Harper a watch maker.

It is possible that there was no Jackson presence at Broughton Grange from about 1690 until Robert Jackson first became a tenant of part of Broughton Grange in 1705.   Later Robert became tenant of the all of Broughton Grange and by 1707 he was also agent for Ann Tracy and Dorothy Lee and their husbands.

Robert remained as tenant at Broughton Grange until 1727, possibly a few years later.  By this time Robert was already in his seventies, but he had recently married, and he disposed of a significant amount of property to a local mason Robert Patton in 1729.  It was about this time that Robert Jackson became embroiled in a nasty sequence of suits with the London section of the family that eventually ended up in the Court of Chancery.  Robert’s property sale may have been to ensure Robert had sufficient funds for his legal expenses.  The Court found in balance in Robert’s favour, but not until after his death.  In the meantime, Robert and his wife Hannah retired from Broughton Grange to the Dog House, a property Robert had purchased about twenty years earlier.

By the time that Robert retired, Anne Tracy née Jackson, by then a widow had probably returned to Great Broughton and for most of her time in the village she lived at Broughton Grange, though she owned other property in the village.

Shortly before her death, Anne moved into one of her other properties in the village along with her widowed daughter Elizabeth Amaiday.  Broughton Grange was sold by Henry Harper, Anne’s eldest nephew, to John Preston an attorney of Stokesley in 1742.  Anne died in 1742 and her daughter Elizabeth died in 1743.

Jackson family presence in Great Broughton continued after Robert Jackson’s death.  Robert and his wife Hannah had three children, Robert, Dorothy and William.  Robert had the unenviable task of executing his father’s over generous Will, effectively a hopeless task, even after the Court of Chancery settlement produced in excess of £600.  Fortunately, Robert’s mother, brother and sister cooperated in solving the financial headache, and eventually the matter was dealt with, but at the cost of the complete disposal of father Robert’s estate, including splitting the Dog House into four separate dwellings and much reduced legacies to Hannah and Dorothy.

What became of Robert Jackson’s three children?  Robert, became a mariner and appears to have left the village about 1760.  William became a bricklayer and lived in Stokesley.  Dorothy married John Raw with whom she had at least ten children, three of whom died in infancy.  John and Dorothy Raw lived in Great Broughton till 1771, thereafter they appear to have left the village.

Sources

Borthwick Institute:  
Cause Papers:  CP.H.2171 (1637),  Dispute re Tithes, Sutton v Jackson
Wills and Probate;  PROB Register 85, Folio 150 on MIC 1005, Robert Jackson’s Will      

National Archives:  
Cause Papers:  
C 6/289/59  1664,  Watson v Howardyne et al, gives details of previous lease holders.
C 11/1/44  1713,   Cornforth v Geer,  contains reference to the conveyance of the Dog House and Harrisons Farm from John and Margaret Cornforth to Robert Jackson
C 11/1495/36  1731,  Harper v Jackson
C 11/2695/42  1732,  Jackson v Tracey
C 11/2695/47  1733,  Jackson v Harper
C 11/1370/14  1733,  Harper v Jackson  Statements taken at Durham
C 11/1370/17  1734,   Harper v Jackson, Deponents statements
The above five references relate to the financial dispute between Robert Jackson and the executors of William Lee, Dorothy Jackson the younger’s third and last husband.  They include some vital event data for the London Jackson family, ie Tracy,Harper, Sadler and Lee.

North Yorkshire County Record Office:
Kirkleatham Papers:  
ZK 4223  Conveyance of property within the Jackson family in 1650.
Old Parish Registers:  
Kirkby cum Broughton, vital event data relating to Broughton Grange and Great Broughton.
Wills and Deeds:   
DB 114 53, refers to sale of property by Robert Jackson to Robert Patton, original Indenture to be retained by Isaac Chapman, 
A 503 616,  14/8/1738,  Henry Harper agrees terms for Anne Tracy occupying part of Broughton Grange.  Anne had been living in Great Broughton several years before this Indenture was executed.
P 379 619  2&3/1742,  I 392 460  3/2/1742  and  B 120 33  3/2/1742,  all relate to the sale of Broughton Grange by Henry Harper to John Preston.



Tuesday 4 February 2020

The Treadmills of Northallerton

The new "retail and leisure destination" to be built on the site of the former prison in Northallerton is to be called "the Treadmills"

Along with many others, I have always thought this name showed distinctly poor taste and by chance I've just come across this, from R P Hastings' Chartism in the North Riding of Yorkshire and South Durham, 1838-1848, (Borthwick Publications, 2004)

Chartism was a nation-wide, radical, grass-roots, movement of the working classes calling for reform and, above all, for the vote.

Noting the local Chartists' tendency to exploit "every propaganda opportunity", Dr Hastings writes:
Northallerton House of Correction had an unenviable reputation.  Samuel Holberry, the young Sheffield Chartist leader, had become a martyr overnight when he died in 1842 at York Castle after imprisonment in Northallerton.  His associate, John Clayton, had died in Northallerton.  North Riding Chartists then took up the case of William Brook, a Bradford Chartist who had been 'reduced from a stout athletic man to a mere skeleton' in the 'Northallerton Hell'.  
Clayton, Brook and others, the Chartists claimed, had been subjected illegally to work on the treadmill.  Northallerton and Brompton Chartists raised a fund to enable Brook to buy his own provisions and petitioned the Home Secretary for his release.  Isaac Wilson, a Brompton weaver and Chartist leader, became treasurer and made weekly prison visits.  Donations came from as far afield as Dundee, Trowbridge, Spitalfields, Brighton and Abergavenny as well as Darlington.  
This is an excerpt from the "Proposed National Petition, to be signed throughout the country, and entrusted to the care of the "Political Prisoners' Release and Charter Petition Convention" from the Chartists' newspaper The Northern Star of 20 March 1841.  This section deals with the "Northallerton Hell" and the treadmill.  (The "silent system" had been introduced to Europe from the USA; under it, strict silence was enforced at all times.)
That in the Gaol of Northallerton, six Chartist prisoners, whose sentence was merely imprisonment, were put to hard labour, on the treadmill, contrary to law. 
That William Brook, one of the said prisoners, who had been convicted of sedition and conspiracy, at the same time as Peddie [convicted in 1840 at York], and whose sentence was three years, fell off the mill; and, though he informed the Visiting Surgeon, that he was frequently troubled with a cramp, yet he was forced, contrary to his sentence, to work upon the wheel, for nearly one calendar month, until removed by an order from the Most Honourable the Secretary of State for the Home Department. 
That your petitioners have been informed that John Clayton, a Chartist, who lately died in Northallerton House of Correction, had been sentenced to solitary confinement, upon a charge of violating the silent system. 
That your petitioners have every reason to believe, from what they have heard of the conduct of the authorities of the prison, that he came to his death in consequence of the cruel manner in which he was treated. 
That Wm Martin, who had been confined in the said House of Correction, Northallerton, was removed to Lancaster Castle, in consequence of the severity of the silent system, and of the tyranny of Wm Shepherd, the superintendent. 
That your petitioners have likewise been informed that the physical condition of the prisoners in the House of Correction, Northallerton, is deteriorated not only by the hard labour of the mill and the horrid silent system, but by the filthy manner in which they are obliged to sleep; that they have been for a fortnight at a time without a clean shirt, and their beds infested with vermin; that the only place where they are permitted to wash, is at a stone trough in the yard, and the superintendent is in the habit of coming to the yard gate and shouting to the petty officers to report the men for being too long washing themselves; that some of the prisoners have been punished for using too much soap, which is a proof that the object of the Governor is to enrich himself instead of attending to the comforts of the unfortunate convicts.
An overview of the history of imprisonment and an illustration of prisoners working on the treadmill, from Henry Mayhew's The Criminal Prisons of London (1862) can be found here.

Thursday 9 January 2020

Canon Atkinson of Danby's articles for the Hutton Rudby Parish Magazine

In July 2000, having discovered that the famous Canon Atkinson of Danby had written a series of articles in the years 1890 to 1893 for the Parish Magazine of All Saints' at Hutton Rudby, I scanned them to make a booklet.  

It has the lengthy (but fully explanatory) title of "Articles contributed to the Parish Magazine of All Saints' Church, Rudby-in-Cleveland by Canon J.C. Atkinson of Danby 1890-1893"

He covers many topics – "Ancient Britons", geology, his excavation of the burial mound at Folly Hill in the park at Skutterskelfe Hall – but perhaps is at his most engaging when he describes in great and loving detail birds, their nests and their eggs.

Malcolm McPhie has scanned the booklet and so anybody interested in these largely unknown articles by the famous Canon Atkinson can find them here on the Hutton Rudby and District Local History Society's Facebook page.