The farmer, John Nellist of Seamer, handed the bones and a flat white button that was found with them to the recently appointed police officer for Stokesley, Charles Gernon. Policing had become a professional matter, and Gernon, who was paid a yearly salary of £105 [1], had been appointed in place of the unpaid parish constables of the past.
It was quickly assumed that the skull was that of William Huntley, because of a protruding tooth in the lower jaw. The Stokesley surgeon Mr del Strother examined the bones, and identified them as those of a man who had probably died from violence as the skull was "broken in". He thought they might have lain in the ground some nine or ten years.
Two days after the bones were found, Police Officer Gernon went to Barnsley to interview Robert Goldsborough at his house. Goldsborough had remarried, and was living under his mother's maiden name of Towers, but evidently Gernon had no difficulty finding him.
Gernon questioned him first about Huntley's watch and Goldsborough began to grow steadily more anxious – at which point Gernon produced a moment of high drama, as he later told the court:
I then put the skull on the table, and told him to look at it and see if it was not the remains of Wm Huntley. When he looked round he said – 'I'm innocent,' and then burst into tears. He seemed agitated, and said 'I’m innocent.' He also said they might swear his life away if they pleased, but he never had any clothes, or a watch, or anything else belonging to Huntley.Gernon did not, however, arrest Goldsborough. The magistrates put out notices offering a reward of £100 to anyone (except the perpetrator) who might give evidence. Search was also made for George Garbutt, who had gone poaching with Goldsborough and Huntley to Crathorne Woods on the last day that anyone remembered seeing William Huntley. Warrants were issued for Garbutt, but no trace of him was to be found.